hey guys-- been working on a post for a few days (in between having a crazy work week), so I'm a little behind and a few points are redundant - someone mentioned using synchronized swimming as a template - I will check it out! - but I mention the same thing below with gymnastics... But I thought it better to post the whole thing in its entirety than try and go back and fix it... I will just get more behind! Ok, here goes:
==
A couple of thoughts from someone who is a former low-level competitive gymnast (and the daughter of two national level gymnastics coaches - my mom is a judge as well):
On the gymnastics side, there are a couple of schools of thought... It is mostly an amateur sport, highlighted at the Olympics. And I know they have gone to a new judging style at that level.
But in any case, at club competitions of all levels, it just about the sport. The outfits are all basically standardized - everyone on the team has the same leotard, and from team to team all that varies is the colors and maybe sleeve length.
Lower level comps are compulsory, and then upper levels are "optionals" - meaning using your own choreography and music.
There is no component for personality or appearance. The scores are based on: difficulty of tricks / skills, and then how well those tricks are executed. Deductions are very very VERY specific.
In fact, if you go to the website NAWGJ - National Association of Women's Gymnastic Judges - you'll see that judges have to TEST to become judges. My mom has had to test many times to either keep her standing as a judge or move up and judge higher levels. You have to know how many tenths of a point you can deduct for flexed feet, bent knees, lack of split, etc etc, on every move. It's pretty intense.
And I want to mention, this is just "artistic gymnastics" - there is also rhythmic gymnastics, acro-sport, power tumbling, etc etc, all with different scoring systems. When I was growing up, I even remember they tried to do "Professional" Gymnastic shows with popular songs and costumes (not sure if that is still around)
Now, I'm not saying pole HAS to be JUST like gymnastics, not at all!! But I think there are similarities and the pole world could use it as a template, and pick and choose and modify from there.
What I feel like is going on in the pole world is people will register for a comp, and will have no idea, sometimes up to week before, whether it is the equivalent of an Artistic Gymnastic meet, or a Rhythmic Gymnastic meet, or Power tumbling. They don't even know what goes into the comp, let alone how they should prepare or how they should feel about the judges.
So here's an idea for a path to some clarity:
PHASE 1 - Applied to high level pole competitions that are already in place - state, regional, national, and international
1. An independent, centralized organization of Pole Fitness Judges (let's just call them PFJ for short) standardizes moves / move names (I know PFA is working on this already - yay!). This is not to say there can't be variations but it will give some structure regarding levels of difficulty and how to score.
2. PFJ then assigns point values and difficulty levels.
3. PFJ (alone or in collaboration with other organizations) derive a few styles of competition
-? This may include but is of course not limited to:
? Artistic pole - like Artistic Gymnastic, focusing on tricks, skills, dance, and choreography but NOT appearance or costumes
? "Polesque" or Theatrical pole - Includes costumes and focuses on storytelling, acting, and original concepts
-? This way pole competitions can specify and be immediately recognized as a certain type of competition and what the judging will be like, regardless of the club / person / group holding the competition. (It should be noted that I think people can have whatever kind of competition they want, it doesn't have to fit in the rules, but they wouldn't get to use the PFJ logo which I would think would be a draw - people like knowing what to expect)
PHASE 2
1. PFJ provides some level designations - for example, levels 1 - 5 or 1 - 10, and specifies what tricks must and cannot be used at each level. Each level can have a regional, national, and international champion, if desired. This way more people can get involved without having to be international elite athletes.
------
Basically, PFJ would take the burden of the structure of a competition off the shoulders of the person holding, it so they could focus on venue, marketing, perks for competitors, making it as nice as possible... ALL the other concerns that people have stated. The would no longer have to worry about the judging scale, and making sure judges are qualified.
Okay, that outline is just something I did for fun, not meant to say that's what should or needs to happen⦠But it's a possible (if loooong) path I worked out for myself and thought you guys might like to read.
I'm just considering this whole thread fun / food for thought for the time being. π