Current competitions. Is anybody getting it right?

[luvlee]

I do not know much about these competitions. I do know one requires you to wear very high heels. I do not think that makes much sense. There are A LOT of great dancers that just dance better without heels. It seems like a silly rule really.

[lolorashel]

Love this question.  Although I hope this thread doesn't get ugly.  I watched some pretty ugly stuff go down with a competition in California earlier this year.  I chatted with some pole peeps earlier this summer about this very question.  One person said that if there are bad competitions, the people will figure it out and stop entering and said bad competition will go away.  Another said that people are so hungry to compete and/or get their name out there, they will continue entering bad competitions.  So how do we, as an industry, find the good competitions and label them so competitors feel safe and can still show off their mad skills?  I too would love to know who is running the best competitions out there.  I was at PPC in LA last May.  It was based on the model set up by the Midwest competition.  I thought it was well-run.  I'm no expert, mind you.  But it felt like a good start to a new line of competitions.  

Here's another question for you.  Many people who do competitions want to achieve pro status so they can teach workshops at a higher level.  How long does that "pro status" last?  Do they have to continue entering and winning competitions?  Or, at some point, are you just so amazing and no longer need to prove yourself? 

Side note…I'm gathering a list of all of the competitions around the world.  I'd love for people to e-mail me the ones I am missing:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WDkiRUv-6eskzU2aWAf6edjvwySwO_yG7PNU-wci9WM/edit?pli=1

[PennyGirl]

Personally I think it's kind of the same that happens with businesses in general, people don't want to frequent businesses who have a bad reputation for corrupt practices. This problem is usually resolved when an alternative business is offerred or when the originating buisness changes ownership and or leadership. I do believe that certain established competitions could gain their reputability if they were to take steps to remove the percieved causes of what ever agregious acts had occurred in the past, and to publicly announce a new beginning, along with steps created to prevent such acts form occurring again. I also believe that most busineses can do fine if they wait out the drama and press forward. I guess it depends on the level of disenchantment felt by their consumers.

[Picklepie]

@luvlee

Yes, USPDF requires you to wear heels for the compulsory round, which is only a maximum of 90 seconds long. The Optional round has no requirements.

But please also be aware that heels are not accepted at some competitions…

“We have to take some of the eroticism out of the moves and also take off the high heels,” International Pole Sports Federation President Tim Trautman said in a previously published report. “We’re going to frame it as these are athletes that you’re watching.” Yes, he was speaking about the Olypics, but I didn't see any heels at his competition either.

I personally always dance in heels when I perform, and I feel that adding an extra 6 inches on my feet does not make me any less athletic; but I also believe that we should be able to dance in whatever makes us feel beautiful and confident. I don't find barefoot dancers any less beautiful and I dance barefoot all the time in my studio, honestly I just dance better in heels.

I hesitate to even respond to this because I know how ugly this sort of thing gets. People have a need to stratify themselves and a desire to belong with like minded people. I just really wish that we could see the beauty in all types of pole dance…from erotic to vertical bar.

While we will never agree with everything that happens at every competition, please try not to devalue the hard work and stress and money and time and effort and emotion and BLOOD, SWEAT, AND TEARS that the competitors put into these competitions. The only reason they are there is to validate all of their self discipline and sacrifice and to show their art to the community they love.

The last time this topic came up some incredibly nasty things were said, and I truly hope that no one will stoop to that point. We are a family…If you can't say anything nice…well you know the rest.

<3 Sarah

[Charley]

Let me begin my personal thoughts by saying that I am about to compete in 5 days and that this is probably my last competition because of the kind of person I have realized I am.  Also let me commend Mary Ellyn on all of her hard work with Midwest, her generous spirit with us competitiors and dedication to building a great event – especially here in the midwest where it's much harder.

I don't think whether a competition is good or bad has any bearing on whether or not competitors and dancers will support it.  There is a big need for many dancers to compete and/or perform and competitions used to be the only way to pursue performing.  When I competed in USPDF ECR it was because I wanted to PERFORM not to compete.  Then I was crushed at how badly I did.  

Last year, I only tried out for Midwest to show my support for the event and was actually accepted which I didn't really expect.  That internal experience was actually kind of good for me.  This year I tried out for it because I felt I had to, like if I didn't people would get upset, I'd lose friends or something…

SO, I don't like competing because I realized I want to live in denial land where I can be the princess in my sandbox and I don't want to know how I stack up, I just don't – it's too hurtful for me.

BUT, if there are going to be competitions I think that there should be MORE of them with different types of rules, different aspects, different types of criteria in order to create as much oportunity for everyone.   I'd like to see competitions take something that they as organizers would like to see (say artistry?) and create their competition to find that kind of dancer, perhaps another organization likes something else and they build their criteria to find that kind of dancer – this way each style and dancer has a fair shake at participating.  Plus with more competitions it will give people an outlet so if an organization doesn't please them they can find a new one.

[Veena]

I'm not too worried about nastiness on this thread, members here are usually respectful and thoughtful with their responses.https://www.studioveena.com/img/smilies/icon_flower.gif

All great thoughts and points have been made! This is something that needs to be discussed. 

I agree that there should be several "types" of competitions out there. We need options! There are some dancers who like the sporty, trick, aspect of pole, and others that fell in love with the heel wearing, sensual side of pole. I think artistry can be shown in both the sporty and sensual side. We need high quality competitions of all kinds both professional level comps and amateur! We should not expect amateur level dancers to bust out the same level of pole moves as the pro!! I think there needs to be a better definition of Pro and Amateur as well. 

*Stands on soap box* BUT, I want to remind everyone, that competing at a professional level for any sport or performing art, will be very taxing on the body and could result in chronic aches and pains later on in life. So PLEASE don't feel that you HAVE to compete in order to be a real pole dancer, or to reap the benefits of pole. Respect your bodies limits and as Charley said in chat "live to pole another day!" https://www.studioveena.com/img/smilies/icon_cheers.gif

[MelCat]

Going off what Charley said, it'd be great to have competition opportunities set up similar to a lot of regular dance competitions, in that it has more of a feel of competing against yourself.  That way you get the exposure to dancing with others and getting to see what else is out there and get feedback in a comparative manner that has a focus on improving as an individual rather than getting the perfect formula of tricks, types of tricks, floorwork, etc that will result in winning a competition. 

[MissHoneyrider]

*sighs and takes a deep breath* I normally would just bite my tounge on this issue but honestly it hurts to see any kind of negative talk surrounding pole comps and accusations of multiple types of malfeasance, including score mistabulation and favoritism. For as long as i have been involved in the "pole community" i have watched poling grow stronger and gain more recognition WITH the help of any and all competitions. We need the diversity to keep the imagination and creativity alive in pole. If we start banning competitions then how does this solve anything? we'll only limit and stifle by having less comps to showcase pole dancing.I have dear friends that probably have a better understanding of the politics and what goes on behind close doors, it's not that i have my head in the sand i just think there has got to be a better way to resolve issues then to just ban something altogether;( 

[Fawnia]

As a judge I feel that the Pole Sports Competition in London last month was ran very well with appropriate criteria and qualified judges. The right criteria and judges equal a great contest. http://www.polesports.org &nbsp; There are other great contests ran for less skilled athletes too, but this is just one example of who is getting it right.

[Charley]

I also want to add that competitions are relatively new to pole dancing.  There will be growing pains with them.  I think it's important to note that no matter how you might feel about a particular competition there are others out there, there will be more coming and in the end – all of these evens promote pole dancing in a good way.

There also lies a burden on hopeful competitors to research a competition, find out what the comp is about and what they are looking for.  What is their criteria?  So, if you just don't like dancing in heels – that's okay there are comps for that, there are comps for heel lovers, there are comps for tricksters, there are comps for dancers and everything in between.  

For every one 1 thing that someone might not like about a particular competition – there is still rationale behind it and there are equally as many arguments "for or against."  

I'd also point out that personal experiences with organizations will differ which makes it even more important for there to be lots of things to choose from.  

I'd love to see more localized pole competitions too so that competitors can learn to compete – because that's something you do need to do – you can perform and dance all day long but putting on a smile and being judged feels really different.

It's also ok if competing just isn't for some people – again another great reason to have more comps ans some smaller comps 🙂

And I sincerely hope that none of these thoughts are offensive because it's important for us to share these types of thoughts because these events do impact our community internally.

[chemgoddess1]

As it has been stated before, people really need to research the competitions they are entering.  Since USPDF was the first big one out there everyone flocks to it, but there are so many comps happening now.  I just had a local girl compete in an exotic dance competition that now has a pole segment.  Pole Champ has been running legit competitions that is also aimed more at exotic dancers….do either of these comps hold any less value then say USPDF or APFC?  I know that ME worked with PDC to set the guidelines for her comp and many in the UK are doing the same.  Transparency is essential.  Got that stripper style?  APFC is probably not the comp you want to enter as they state they are looking more for the athletic style.  Don't have that stripper style?  Pole Champ is probably NOT what you want to enter.

 

We as a society have gotten so used to the easy button….we want fame and we don't want to have to research.

 

[nymphdancer]

I will be honest I don't even like that there are comps in pole. I go to mid-west to support my friends and to see people I have known on line and would like to actually meet. I competed for years on horses. Comps tend to bring out the worst in people. I got into pole not only because it was a fun way to exercise but because of the loving relationships and supportiveness of the women involved. I had never liked being around other women much until I found pole and my pole friends. I feel like comps start bringing the cattiness and pit us against one another again which make me sad.

[Mary Ellyn]

Thanks Webmaster for the shout out and everyone who has made supportive comments about Midwest.

I think it's very important that we have a variety of choices within competitions as much as variety within classes and studios.

Lorashel mentioned how long does the status hold after winning a competition? I think it depends on what that person does to promote themselves. Do they stay in the public eye by touring and teaching, participating as judge, creating videos, performing at big events, etc. If they don't, the pole community will lose track of them quickly with so much new talent emerging all the time.

[hrhlaura]

I really wanted to add:

I started the competition, EastCoastPole, in South Africa, as a local competition in order to help people get used to performing and competing. It is only open to local dancers – but we have had great support from the pole dancers around the country and judges are always from out of town (not local) in order to take the bias out of judging. The hardest part has been trying to make sure that the competition can never be seen to be biased or showing favouritism. 

Because of the difficulty with the difference between tricks and dance etc. we do not limit whether people can dance in shoes or not. We try and have 3 judges, one with a specialisation in pole tricks, the other with pole dance and transitions/spins etc and lastly an external dancer. We believe that the beauty of dance is universal and instantly recognisable to any dancer regardless of the "props" or forms of dance. This last judge focuses just on the magic of the routine.

We also have a problem trying to distinguish between intermediate, advanced and professional. Each year we can only make it better by learning from the past year.

Some of the improvements we will be making next year will be to add Junior and Masters levels. These levels will not be judged for placing (first, second, third) but rather as an exam (gold = 80% and above, silver 70-80% etc). It is felt that this will help eliminate competition between people and rather encourage individual performance. Juniors will be open to competitors between 16-18 years. Masters will be open to competitors 40 years or older.

The beginners, intermediate and advanced categories will remain. There will be a professional category as well for competitors who have competed at a national or international level (criteria still to be established). Intermediate move restrictions will remain but instead of limiting certain moves we are looking at moving towards restricting the number of advanced moves. We have found that everyone's idea of advanced moves is different. To help with this you will only be allowed to perform 2 advanced moves in your routine. (as usual the specifics still need to be discussed).

If anyone has anything to add that we might be able to benefit from please do comment as we appreciate any way to improve.

[PippiParnasse]

I don’t think people are going to stop doing crappy competitions. (And I am not really in the loop enough to know which are perceived as illegitimate, so don’t take that as a jab at anyone.) The problem is that if you don’t have a title, some people won’t give you the time of day. Taking nth place in a bullshit comp gets you more respect than not competing. And honestly, there is some value in that. Even if the organization raises eyebrows, you’ve still proven that you can run with the big dogs, which counts for something.

Unfortunately that means that comps will always have business, even if they are shady. And because of the circumstances I’ve outlined above, I can’t blame those who choose to take part. Just try not to get taken advantage of.